
Jerry:
We stand by our first response to your inquiry and believe it was sufficient to describe our use of the term.
It seems your “loss” is not related to our explanation; rather, it seems to be caused by the information you found in your internet search. (Accordingly, we edited your follow-up inquiry to remove the confusing components you took from the internet (or other sources) and attempted to express your underlying question caused by that inapplicable information.)
You indicated you are at a loss of understanding how the Law of Consecration is to be applied within the Way of Kings™. However, our response clearly designated that as follows:
Admin wrote:Accordingly, we acknowledge the necessity for making that law, and the respective stewardship formed by it, a primary controlling factor over everything we do. … The Way of Kings™ acknowledges that fact and recognizes the necessity for going back to that law as the foundation for everything else we do; that is exactly the reason we base every asset protection system we generate on Foundational Instruments that secure that law as the foundation for every asset protection system we generate.
Thus, as a matter of law, the Way of Kings™ Foundational Instruments sets God’s law, beginning with the Law of Consecration, as the controlling law basis for everything else we do.
We provided that level of directness and complexity to our responses to your inquiry hoping to resolve the matter for you and for anyone else that might have a similar question. However, though a complete response may clear up a matter for one person it can provide enough new information to complicate the response for others. Therefore, if the complexity of our response in any way made the matter less clear, here is the same response in a simpler form:
- The Law of Consecration is the foundation of every system we generate.
- The “Law of Consecration” is defined only by the words of the Law as it is found in Torah.
- When considered in accord with God’s promise offered by covenant, the law requires:
- All of the covenant man’s time, talent, effort, energy, everything he has ever had and everything he will ever have is bound to the purpose of building up God’s Kingdom.
- All of which remains under the control of the so covenanted man.
We also recognize that as soon as we reference a scripture some people automatically jump to the conclusion that we are referring to a religious belief system of some kind. So, let’s also eliminate that from this discussion with the following response: “When we reference Torah [The law of God (which was canonized as the first five books of the Holy Bible)], we do so acknowledging it as a historical Law source.” The fact that people also recognize it as a foundation for religious beliefs is irrelevant both to our response and to our purpose. Though the Way of Kings™ asset protection systems are based upon the foundation of the simple expression of God’s Law as it was presented in Genesis 1–3, the Way of Kings™ is not affiliated with or patterned after any religion or religious dogma. That is exactly why our original response describing the Law of Consecration was prefaced with the following statement:
Admin wrote:As the Way of Kings™ uses the term “Law of Consecration” it is not defined other than by the words of the term.
You indicated that you were attempting to follow the Standard for Review to understand the term. Accordingly, please notice that the words of the Law, as we presented it, are at the very core of the nature and existence of mankind’s creation; therefore, after you acknowledge man’s creation the Law of Consecration is the first instruction God gave to man; thus, it should be the foundation for everything we do that comes after that. Accordingly, it is the basis for every asset protection system the Way of Kings™ generates. It is as simple as that.
You stated:
Metech wrote:I am attempting to understand what my relationship would be with the WOK.
Given all that we have already presented we do not understand that statement; primarily because we have repeatedly stated:
The Way of Kings™ wrote:The Way of Kings™ only designs, generates, packages and delivers custom built asset protection systems.
We also clarify that statement by explaining that we provide no other services; that means no support, management or other services of any kind other than the information presented on our websites. That is exactly why, before we generate any asset protection system components for any patron, we make sure the patron has a service like Team Law available to them. That way we can be certain our patron has the personal resources for learning how to use a system the likes of which we provide. Accordingly, we do not understand your statement because the only relationship any patron can ever possibly have with the Way of Kings™ is they might have us design, package and deliver an asset protection system to them. We provide no other function or service.
You asked that question as if such a system would compel some other level of control or relationship with us; however, no such thing or function exists. That is one of the Way of Kings™ most powerful and advantageous functions, we only design, generate, package and deliver asset protection systems. Once such a system is delivered, the Way of Kings™ has nothing further to do with it — ever.
(To respond to the next portion of your inquiry we first note our understanding of the term “religion”, which simply means: “repetitious way of life”; the term can also refer to: “the particular dogma particular groups follow as they live their agreed upon repetitious way of life”.)Accordingly, you next referenced your investigation into the term “Law of Consecration” as it is used by others; and, noted that you found references to the “Mormon church”; then, you asked if our use of the term had anything to do with what you found regarding their alleged application of the term. Again, we clarified our use of the term “Law of Consecration” in our first response:
Admin wrote:As the Way of Kings™ uses the term “Law of Consecration” it is not defined other than by the words of the term.
Therefore, our use of the term is defined by the terms of the law itself and not by any religion’s interpretation of the same.
The Church of Jesus-Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons) uses the same term; yet, most of its members cannot tell you where that law is in scripture. We deleted your specific reference to their alleged application of the term from your inquiry because:
- It failed to reasonably express their application of the term;
- That alleged application had nothing to do with the Way of Kings™ use of the term; and,
- Any implication that that alleged application could have anything to do with our use of the term was expressly excluded by our original response to your inquiry.
However, though the Way of Kings™ use of the term has nothing to do with any specific religion, our understanding of that church’s use of the term “Law of Consecration” and the covenant bound by it would be more correctly expressed by the terms of the covenant; even as we presented it:
The Way of Kings™ wrote:The Law of Consecration requires: “All of our time, talent, effort, energy, everything we have ever had and everything we will ever have.”
You may also notice the Holy Roman Catholic Church acknowledges that obligation as, “The Law of Stewardship”, the Hebrew religions call it, “The Law of Inheritance” and even the Aramaic term “Islam” transliterates into English with that exact obligation. In fact, any religion that does not acknowledge that very obligation automatically admits it does not follow God’s command as provided in Torah; but, that too is irrelevant to our application of the term.
Again, the Way of Kings™ only designs, generates, packages and delivers asset protection systems to its patrons. Thereafter, we have nothing to do with such systems’ operation or control.
Accordingly, we are not concerned with any religion’s specific dogma (religious beliefs); rather, we recognize that most people have such beliefs and virtually all such beliefs are based upon this common simple law we call the Law of Consecration. Accordingly, we acknowledge such beliefs must be bound by a Covenant between the believer and God; and therefore, the believer (of their own free will and choice) must thereafter control everything else they do in accord with said Covenant. However, though the religions teach this principle, we have found none of them that teach or provide any application whereby their followers can effectively learn or apply the principle in their daily lives. Thus, we set our Foundational Instruments to secure that covenant in law as the basis for every asset protection system we generate.
God not only provided the command but He gave man the dominion, agency and possession (sovereignty) necessary to be personally accountable to it according to the man’s own dictates and desires. In fact, that was the first command God gave man and that command remains in full force and effect to this day. We recognize that and accordingly that is how our Foundational Instruments secure that relationship in law—with man’s accountability to God alone in his honor to and application of that command.
Metech wrote:To whom is my property consecrated?
If you understand the Law of Consecration and accept the opportunity offered in it by God, then you will understand your possession of the things of this world is held in stewardship to God and not as “your (personal) property”; thus, if you consecrate the same in accord with the Law of Consecration, you acknowledge that those things belong to God and to His Kingdom. Additionally, you will understand that those things you may so possess are part or your stewardship—and so remain completely under your control.
Beside that point; if you were to use said Standard for Review to examine the nature of the relationships most Americans currently have with property they think of as you expressed it, “my property”, you would discover the actual owner of said property is the taxpayer identified by its social security number. Further review would prove all property so owned is held in trust for the beneficiary of that taxpayer; which is, Corp. U.S. Accordingly, those people already hold all such property under their control in trust for Corp. U.S. Thus, such property is not “your property”—it belongs to Corp. U.S. and you merely hold it in trust for them (see Team Law’s presentation of,
The Seduction).
The Way of Kings™ simply provides a way to awaken from the seduction and legally and lawfully remove the property from Mammon and properly place the assets you already control into their proper place as set by the Law of Consecration, where they will remain under your control in accord with God’s law instead of Mammon’s.
Metech wrote:To whom is my "residue" consecrated?
Who determines the wants and needs of those who have not and how much they are to receive?
We have no idea what you meant by either of these question. Neither of them seems to have any relation to anything we have presented; so, we must assume they both come from your research into some dogma that has nothing to do with the Way of Kings™.
The nature of your last post seems to be an inquiry regarding the possibility of some presupposed religious dogma having a relationship with what the Way of Kings™ does. No such thing exists.
Again, the Way of Kings™ only designs, generates, packages and delivers custom designed asset protection systems in accord with its patrons orders. The patron retains all control of all of the business system so designed.
The inherent nature of the systems we so provide is copacetic with virtually all religions and in fact the nature of its application enhances people’s understanding of their religious beliefs; thus, better preparing them to live in accord with what they truly believe better than they have ever been able to do before.
We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about The Way of Kings™
